The thing about Latin though, is that it really does help you understand where our language comes from. It is also a very precise language - hence very good at steering away from ambiguity. I imagine this is why scientific phyla are given Latin designations. You know where you are with it. It does, as they say, exactly what it says on the tin. Which may seem obvious, except that so much of today's languages do not. They are, for the most part, derivations of a mish mash of other languages, strewn across the globe as one regime toppled another and mother tongues changed hands at the behest of tyrannical despots. There's bits of Viking, French, and doubtless other titbits rolled up in the words we use every day. We have irregular verbs, words that have two meanings, different spellings of the same word - none of this in Latin. Which is why it is a language that is still highly regarded.
I know that a lot of people are of the opinion that it doesn't really matter if you get the spelling right, because as long as the other person understands what you are trying to communicate, then its job is done. I'm afraid I have to say I don't agree. I think that language gives us identity, and I also think that if you want people to take what you have to say seriously, the very least you can do is present it correctly. I'm not too fussed on the '8 items or less' argument (In case you aren't aware, the correct phrase would be '8 items or fewer'). To me, that's possibly going a bit far. It does niggle me; but then I accept that I am more finickity than most.
I thought that to save me ranting every time I see it, I'd just get the right bits down here so anyone who likes can use it as a quick reference guide. Or tell me to sod off, whichever you deem appropriate. I don't want to get too stuffy about it, and start going into the overuse or misuse of some words (for example the trend to, like, put the word 'like' everywhere...) as I think this is more a reflection of current argot rather than a lazy or ignorant misuse of language. What would really make my day would be if you can spot a mistake in this blog. The last thing I want to do is come over all highbrow, but I can't even look at Facebook now without seething. Our kids use it every day, is it any wonder that we sometimes struggle to comprehend things they have written?
I hasten to add at this point that there is every chance there will be errors in this very piece - I don't want to get overly pedantic about it, and have quite deliberately adopted a conversational tone, not thinking too much about being obsessed with grammatical correctness. I also accept that it's very easy to get frightfully caught up in the finer nuances of inflection and suggestion inherent in different words and phrases. I just want to make a few basic observations.
So, here we go, in no particular order:-
THEIR - means belonging to them. It is possessive.
THERE - indicates something's position. As in, 'the car is over there'
THEY'RE - is a contraction of 'they are'
*
ARKS - a collection of large boats, such as the one used by Noah and a number of animals, to survive during a flood
ASK - to put a question to someone
*
YOUR - is possessive. 'I have borrowed your book'
YOU'RE - is a contraction of 'you are'
*
ITS - is a possessive pronoun, i.e. belonging to 'it' whatever 'it' may be. As in, 'the elephant is known for its fondness of sticky buns'
IT'S - a contraction of 'it is' or 'it has'. As in, 'it's been great to see you'
ITS' - DOES NOT EXIST!!
*
BROUGHT - the past tense of 'bring'
BOUGHT - the past tense of 'buy'
*
EFFECT - more commonly a noun - Something brought about by an external influence. Can be used as a verb if the agent caused something to happen. For example, 'the manager effected positive improvements in the office'
AFFECT - almost always a verb - To have an influence on. For example 'High interest rates can affect house prices'
*
*
TO - in a direction so as to reach
TOO - another word for 'also'
*
PACIFIC - a large body of salt water occupying nearly half the surface of the earth
SPECIFIC - having a particular bearing or reference
*
LOOSE - not tied down
LOSE - unable to find any more
*
Correct - 'I would have remembered my coat had I known it would rain'
Incorrect - 'I would of remembered my coat had I known it would rain'
*
It's 'definitely', not 'definately'. Imagine it being from 'infinite'
*
The following are two separate words; not one
A lot
Thank you
While we're here, let's have a little chat about the apostrophe. The purpose of the apostrophe is to denote ownership, or contraction.
By contraction, I mean as in doesn't (does not)
By ownership, I mean as in 'the dog's bone'
If you don't put in an apostrophe, it means the word has been made into a plural. For example 'We have over two hundred cars in stock'
Equally, if you put in an apostrophe when you mean to pluralise, you look like an absolute idiot:
'Get your Christmas Tree's here!' NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
REALISE/ REALIZE, etc.
This is an interesting one. Most people (myself included) assumed that 'realize' was an Americanisation, and that realise was the correct spelling. In fact, I was incorrect. Either is fine in this country. In these matters of debate, I refer to Oxford Dictionaries and they give their conclusions here
TEXT ABBREVIATIONS
Due to the shortened nature of texts/ tweets, abbreviations are often used. There are no hard and fast rules here, but I wonder if any of you share my opinions:
ur - You are
yr - Your
m8 - Not acceptable in any situation whatsoever if you are over 14. And even then, frowned upon.
luv - Hell no.
CAPITALISATION
Capital letters are for the beginnings of sentences and for proper nouns. Or acronyms. Nowhere else.
Yours Sincerely - NO
Yours sincerely - YES
When I started to type this, I thought it would be a paragraph or two. As you can see, it has expanded rather beyond that. I'd be delighted to know if you can think of anything I have missed, or if you think I am mistaken anywhere - by all means comment below. And feel free to pass it amongst your peers. Hope you like it, it makes a change from me banging on about Bromptons...
Thanks Alasdair - that was fast work.
ReplyDeleteI don't see a lot of the brought/bought and arks/ask carry-on myself - is it a London thing?
Let's fight the good fight on acronym plurals: yes to OCDs, no to OCD's.
Don't start me on principle/principal, you have a fan (fanatic rather than something to wave in front of your face to cool yourself down)in Sally and I.
ReplyDeleteI have to confess to using "luv" prolifically with people I don't know very well, while reserving "love" for people I actually, well, love. It's a personal preference that I've adhered to for nigh on 30 years now, so apologies if it upsets you.
ReplyDeleteI've never encountered "arks", but have seen "ax" on Twitter, when the author meant "ask". I think it's a particular to certain areas of London, as I haven't encountered it here in Scotland.
The 'ask/aks' thing is just that has now infiltrated modern slang.
ReplyDeleteI agree with everthing you said here. It does matter, not just because it makes things very hard/irritating to read!
The 'arks' thing is quite recent, and very possibly more prevalent in London. I find it irksome though. I'm not too fussed on the luv thing - as an informal thing- done it myslef. I was on one at the time... :)
ReplyDeleteI love it!
ReplyDeleteAnother thing that makes my blood boil is when people don't know the difference between where and were. Seriously.
So, onto the error: shouldn't it be "There ARE bits of Viking, French ..." ?
When I lived in London, it was always "arsk" - this arks business is a new one on me...
ReplyDeleteD'you feel better now? I quite enjoy having ESOL students living in my house. The children have no choice but to speak clearly and correctly to be understood; they soon got tired of repeating their slang sentences and receiving a confused stare in response. We were lucky enough to have a great English teacher in my secondary school, although I'm sure he's turning in his wormy grave every time I twitter drunk.
ReplyDeleteI feel much better. Ostensibly so I can refer people to it in the future, but really so I can get it off my chest. I suppose, Lou, it should be there are; but as I said, I've written it in a conversational way. It's intended as more of a colloquialism I guess.
ReplyDeleteCorrect use of capitalisation is definitely important. It's the difference between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse.
ReplyDeleteBravo. Never seen arks written down but growing up in south London in the 70s/80s I heard it a lot from black friends and I can't say it ever bothered me.
ReplyDeleteMore recently, I've heard it creep into the speech of youth in general where it is far more irksome as a deliberate affectation. Tim Westwood, I'm looking at you.